Nearly Famous October 31, 2009Posted by Phil Groom in News.
Tags: Biggleswade, Biggleswade Books, Biggleswade Chronicle, David Marriott, Henlow and Langford, Sue Groom
add a comment
Thank you to the good people at the Biggleswade Chronicle (yes, David, Biggleswade really is for real) for featuring both Sue and me in this week’s issue, welcoming Sue to the area and bigging up my dreams for a new bookshop for the area.
Sue made page 21 and online, I made page 31. That’s definitely nearly famous in my book.
Daring to Dream October 27, 2009Posted by Phil Groom in Bookshop Ramblings, Watching and Waiting.
Tags: Biggleswade, Books, Bookshop, Reading
I dreamed of people reading: an older man in his armchair, laughing uproariously at Bill Bryson’s latest; a young man, marching along, head in his book, enthralled, enchanted, oblivious to the world around him; a woman, relaxing with a new romance — or was it a crime story or a thriller she was absorbed in? Two children, excited as they discovered new worlds, new possibilities.
Who were these people? I don’t know: they could have been me, they could have been you; but all of them were loving and enjoying their books, real books printed on real paper.
Where were these people? They were everywhere. But as I looked, I could see them close to home, not far away at all: in my street, in my neighbourhood; and so another dream was born and began to take shape: Biggleswade Books.
Can that dream become reality? I hope so; and I hope that you, gentle reader, will share my dream…
Burning Boxes in the Twittersphere October 20, 2009Posted by Phil Groom in Theological Reflection.
Tags: Authentic Media, Cornerstone Books, David M Keen, Evangelicalism, Keira Knightly, Supersimbo, Thinking outside the box, Twitter, Unicorn Tree Books
Boxes! Boxes, boxes, boxes — but at last we’ve unpacked them all and Sue & I are getting settled in our new home. Sue was officially licensed to her new post as Priest-in-Charge of Henlow & Langford last week, first Sunday services now over & done and I’ve survived the endless round of, “… and this is Phil, our new priest’s husband.” All in all, it’s been great to be welcomed by such a lovely bunch of friendly people.
Back to the boxes, however: you’ll be pleased to know we haven’t burnt them — most are going back to the removals company whilst the odd few that aren’t fit for reuse are going for recycling (Bedfordshire is very hot on recycling).
But I decided to celebrate yesterday by flattening a virtual box in the twittersphere, and posted:
which led to some interesting conversations…
authenticmedia @notbovvered There’s a box?19/10/2009 from SeesmicKercal @notbovvered Sadly I stepped out of one box, into another box and am watching the latter being flattened with me still in it.19/10/2009 from web
~~~waves of empathy for Kercal, everybody!~~~
Since authenticmedia seemed a tad bemused, I identified the box for them, but they either didn’t get it or didn’t want to:
supersimbo was more willing to engage:
supersimbo @notbovvered now that i see what you were meaning, is it possible to define “evangelicalism” as a box? It means so many dif things now….19/10/2009 from webnotbovvered @supersimbo Too late, mate: you’ve done gone and burnt the mutha! Nuthin but smoke & ash now…
19/10/2009 from Twitterrific
Quite right, supersimbo, I am but a mischief maker 😉 — but let the conversation go on. Not sure how Keira Knightly got involved, but she did. If you understand, please enlighten me: there could even be a free book in it for you…
supersimbo @Cornerstonebks that may have been my point about burning a box with stuff in it but the actual thing we thought we burnt is still there 🙂19/10/2009 from websupersimbo @Cornerstonebks ie: effects of evangelicalism, methods, failures etc are in the box but the actual thing is too big to be contained in a box19/10/2009 from web
… which kinda brings us to the end of the conversation, with thanks to everyone who joined in and apologies to anyone whose tweets I’ve missed. Had I known it was going to spark such a stimulating dialogue, I’d’ve come up with a hashtag like #evangelicalbox — so if you, gentle reader, choose to take up the challenge of my final question, perhaps you’d care to use it?
The 140 character limit only applies if you’re twittering: comments left here can be as long as you like, I guess. My own answer is “… and a ‘best before’ date that’s long since passed for evangelicalism.” If you think otherwise, feel free to tell us why…